Comments on: Forex Bling Backtesting Results

By: Boris

Boris — Sun, 08 Nov 2009 09:17:37 +0000

Hallo i want to ask you can you send me demo versions on your EAs i want to test it and check which one is the best for me and then i will contact with you again to buy some EAs which work on real account i;m a signal provider and if your EAs are really so good i will buy them

By: Jusuf

Jusuf — Sun, 27 Sep 2009 03:07:17 +0000

Please, do not free-s the services, I do not mind to pay the subscription fee.

Just limit the number of your members.. it will keep your services right..

By: juck

juck — Sun, 27 Sep 2009 01:11:16 +0000

Patrick, I know importance of their DLL function.
I don’t say to open logic.
Their intellectual property rights should be protected.
I agree with you.

I only want to check backtest result by myself.

I think they use IsTesting() function to prohibit backtest.
I hope them to remove only one sentence about IsTesting() function.

By: Wann

Wann — Sat, 26 Sep 2009 15:27:07 +0000

@moonlee. I didn’t put 5 or 10k into an account. I used only $700(US). The reason for the small amount is because I don’t trust automated trading with my larger accounts. I am encouraged because from March until now my $700 account has grown to $1300 using only one EA until Forex Bling came out. So my theory is that I will use ea on my small account and perhaps it will grow big. Even if it loses all my money I wouldn’t care because my initial risk amount was small and it was money I can afford to lose. Please know that even though my account almost doubled in 6 months, my relative drawdown was only 15%. Given the reqrd, this is an acceptable risk.

By: Wann

Wann — Sat, 26 Sep 2009 15:19:58 +0000

@ Glentrader. I am trying to understand that if the Forex market is so huge, why would there be liquidity issues with a particular ea if too many people use it? Retail traders represent a very small percentage of forex traders. I think liquidity issues affect bucket shops and non-ecn brokers who take positions opposite of their customers. They simply don’t have enough on-hand to deal with the influx of orders.

By: Steve

Steve — Sat, 26 Sep 2009 13:12:20 +0000

I’m with Wann. He said it so well. Great to see some honesty here. What is also good, I did’nt even see some hyped up actor trying to feed us some robot rubbish as they do. So far, you guys are the genuine article. Keep up the good work. My subscription is here to stay. Thanks heaps.

By: Glen trader

Glen trader — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:45:16 +0000

I don’t thing the with lifetime membership will affect their opportunity. Forex Bling has became one of the hottest Forex product at Clickbank. The decision to limit the subscriber should benefit its subscriber. A good trading system should only available to a limited number of users. We do not want what happen in the fapturbo happens here.

By: moon lee

moon lee — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:50:39 +0000

Not everyone can start using a five or ten grand deposit. I put my 500 in this system. Any decision to lower the subcription cost defenitely get my full support.

By: Patrick Bern

Patrick Bern — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:45:13 +0000

Juck, I know why we can’t backtest with the ea; they do not put all the logic inside the ea. The important factor must be in their server. With the ea is so easy to be decompiled nowadays, even the dll can be cracked; the most secure way to protect someone intellectual is to deliver it as a signal receiver program.

By: juck

juck — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:47:14 +0000

If foward test conforms with backtest, I can believe these backtest results.

Why do you send us backtest as separate package.
Your EAs made good results for many years.
You should send us backtest available packages.